Category Archives: historic fiction

Bomb cyclone Feb 2026

Screens so caked with snow, I had to open the door to see the accumulation.

So far, we have only four or five inches but it’s supposed to snow all day. Today’s plans cancelled, of course.

I left the writing retreat early yesterday and so did two others. They were predicting snow for much later in the day for Amherst and even later than that for Boston, but it was already doing SOMETHING at nine a.m. and anyway I was gonna be too tense to be able to write or listen well. It was the right decision.

What I wrote on Saturday and Sunday morning was disappointing in any case. For instance, the scene I produced yesterday started in Henderson, Kentucky and somehow ended up in West Feliciana, Louisiana. Oops. People didn’t know if the daughter was the mother or the daughter or dead or alive. Ha! This kind of feedback is helpful.

Other off-the-cuff writing didn’t land either. One narrator (um, that would be me) was dubbed “smug.” Yikes.

Listening was the best though. It often is at these things. Many phrases and characters will stay with me for a long time (I’m looking at you, Ronna!)

I drove briefly around the UMass campus on Sunday and there were so many new buildings that I barely recognized the place. Oh, there was the library (I liked a carrel on the 11th floor). There was the art complex (topped with solar panels — yeah!) And there was the ugly concrete Campus Center. There memory held — it was ugly in 1978 and remains ugly today.

Didn’t feel a lick of nostalgia.

Speaking of snow and blizzards and memory and the 70’s, I would’ve been at UMass during the Blizzard of 1978. Hmm. I don’t seem to have much memory of it and let me just say that is as good a descriptor of me back in the day as anything.

As for the tariff decision, I’ve been schooled by Hubbell. Let’s take the win, he says. Marshall got it wrong, he points out. Don’t be so defeatist, etc.

Yes, it could have been worse because in this timeline EVERYTHING can be worse. The SCOTUS could have, for whatever reason, hallucinated all over the relevant statute and invented more (MORE!) broad and sweeping executive powers. They properly read and applied the law. Hoo-hey!

Let me emphatically state that I am thrilled Trump lost on this.

Musing about the Audubons

Sometimes as a writer it’s productive to pick up a long-neglected notebook. It might surprise you, or better yet, re-energize you. Three years ago, I was enthralled with Lucy Audubon as a possible subject. I read two biographies of John James, one of her, and did some preliminary research. However, I kept asking myself: do I want to spend years with this material?

Hers was a difficult life, one of repeated abandonment by her husband and of constant financial struggles caused by both the ineptitude and neglect of that husband. Loneliness, poverty, and grievance are difficult themes.

Well, a couple of days ago some scribbled scenes from years back got me reconsidering. In both workshops this week, I spit out new passages even though I hardly remember enough factual background to do so.

I know from writing The Weight of Cloth that it’s helpful, maybe even necessary, to occasionally write in one’s own voice about what you are learning. I call these passages novel adjacent. Maybe this is unique to writing historic fiction where you have to absorb all kinds of information about another age — and not just intellectually but emotionally and viscerally too.

Anyway, here is a NOVEL ADJACENT passage from July 2023.

The travel options were few in those days – boat, horseback, wagon, or foot. We often hear about what a striking figure Audubon was — tall, handsome, with a thick mane of hair — but it is also notable that he had huge feet. Our famous birder could walk five miles an hour, no trouble. If it seems amazing to paddle down two-thirds the length of the Mississippi and back several times in a single lifetime, imagine walking 100’s of miles – something Audubon did routinely.

Also try to imagine riding on horseback with your two-year-old on your saddle and your wife on her own horse by your side FOR 800 MILES from Louisville to Pennsylvania, in the winter no less. Now image such a trek through dense woods with no real roads.

John James Audubon lived his life as if success was assured. Forget the failed businesses, the shifting accounts to avoid debt collectors, the 200 drawings destroyed by rats, the uphill battle to find an engraver worthy of his work. In between every misguided attempt to start a business, he was drawing. Birth of two sons. Drawing. Almost killed in a knife fight. Drawing. Loss of a daughter in infancy. More drawing.

When it came time to produce a work for sale, he stuck to his guns. No, he insisted to the printers, do not make them smaller. The birds must be near to life-sized. Portfolios measuring in feet rather than inches were a harder sell but Audubon was adamant, sure somehow that his vision for Birds of America would succeed. He bucked scientific illustration standards of the day too by including vegetation and sometimes even hills and towns in the distance. It’s hard to appreciate now but depicting birds with flora and not suspended in empty space, isolated, was a novel idea then.

Letters from England back to Lucy show less confidence. She waited and waited for him to make himself plain, for him to make the simple ask: “Come to England. I need you.” Instead he deferred to her wishes in a way that came across as cold and detached. He told her to write about poverty less, making clear that he was reading her letters in the drawing rooms of wealthy men. The affront of that! She, the breadwinner, was not to mention money? No wonder she relied so heavily on her sons in those years, grown men by then. No wonder one of those sons refused to speak to his father for half a decade.

Mid-read of one Audubon biography, I was charged with checking in on my neighbor’s dog. My neighbors were three years into a what seemed an endless kitchen revamp and hence the dining room was stacked with boxes of pots and pans and food stuff. I had to walk through the room carefully, twisting sideways at times, to get to the dog’s bowl.

It was a real mess. A temporary mess with a purpose, but still a mess. But hold on! There I was mid-twist, when I looked at the walls. There hung not one or two, not three or four, but seven Audubon prints! They are huge. They are stunning. They silence me with their beauty. They turn a room shit-heaped with clutter into a museum. Or a shrine.

The birder-husband was long gone by then, but the prints remained. What better testament to the staying power of art?

Having recently read about the complicated etching process, I brought my nose right up to the glass on one print to really take a look. It astonished me then and now how a series of scratch marks on metal, acid baths, and rolled-on inks can produce such artistic and life-like renderings.

This is what Audubon risked everything for. This is what made him insufficiently attentive to Lucy. This is what drove him into the woods, alone, time and time again. It’s a legacy that turns his many failed businesses into mere footnotes, or even gateways, for had one of those ventures succeeded it might have consumed his energies and prevented the necessary devotion to birds, the notebooks filled with drawings.

And what of Lucy? Late in life, she wrote in a letter: You might not recognize me. I’ve grown thin, turned grey, and have lost all of my teeth. The absences were long and punishing. She had to work to survive, sometimes as a governess to plantation owners’ children, sometimes as a lone teacher in a town school. She offered piano lessons. It’s not a stretch to assume that she resented her husband – his singular and motivating purpose dragging him off either into the wilderness to draw or to England to schmooze for patrons and oversee the printing process. Imagine the long months going by without a letter and when finally one arrived, being on tenterhooks, motivated to pack and sail if only he would ask and instead reading, “Do what you want.”

*. *. *.

Here are a couple of other relevant posts.

Lucy Sketches (April 2025)

Focus and Restrictions (May 2023)

Fly to Lah (October 2021)

Rabbit holes and synchronicity

One of the best aspects of writing historic fiction is going down rabbit holes. Hey! It’s research! And, since you never know what information is gonna turn out to be important, no rabbit hole is too weird.

For instance, writing The Weight of Cloth, I found a record of Eliza Lucas Pinckney’s will, which of course listed the enslaved “property“ that she was bequeathing. To see names of people written out like this was one of many moments that drove home the inhumanity of chattel slavery. But also, the testamentary disposition provided me with a list of names, and I used many of them for secondary characters in the book.

In another rabbit hole, I found the terms of Sarah Rutledge’s father’s will, which informed how I crafted her character. These are just two examples.

On Saturday (Nov 8), I found a PhD thesis written by an archaeology student about the Fairbanks household in Dedham, Massachusetts. In it, he mentions that either Ebenezer Fairbanks Senior or Ebenezer Fairbanks Junior (Jason’s father and brother) (or both) enlisted to serve in the Revolutionary War. The very next day on Sunday, the magazine section of The Boston Globe covered Ken Burns’s upcoming documentary about the Revolutionary War. There was mention of an Ebenezer serving. Now his Ebenezer wasn’t from Dedham, but the echo of Ebenezer soldiers in less than 24 hours was a moment of synchronicity that made me sit up and pay attention. Moments like these are always affirming.

So that’s the thing in writing historic fiction — historic fact is both limiting and propulsive.

No lights

So many gorgeous shots of colorful night skies around here from Tuesday and Wednesday. The Cape, Rhode Island, New Hampshire. I didn’t see or capture any color.

Today was cold. Not as cold as yesterday but still. Continued to bring plants into the house or the shed.

Writing might be gaining momentum, fun rabbit holes and all, but I am wondering what it would be like to abandon a historic timeline and just write? I honestly don’t know if I can do it.

I’ll keep you posted.

“We just have to keep on grinding,” Aaron Glenn, coach of NY Jets. On TV now.

Notes on Perez Morton

Sarah Wentworth Morton’s husband, Perez Morton, had an affair with her younger sister, Fanny. Fanny was living with the couple at the time. Was it consensual? Coerced? People speculate differently about that.

Time: 1787.

Background: Sarah and Fanny Wentworth were the offspring of a wealthy slave trader and moved in elite circles in post-revolutionary Boston. At this time, newspapers and novels were seeing a rise in both sentimental fiction and crime reporting.

1788: Fanny gave birth to a daughter. After the birth, Fanny killed herself. The daughter was shipped off to someone in Weston and as of yet, I haven’t found anything in the record about her. Newspapers published Fanny’s suicide note.

Fanny’s father wanted Perez indicted but John Adams intervened (yes! that John Adams). And there may have very nearly been a duel between Perez and one of the Wentworth brothers.

So there’s passion and controversy and scandal and at the center of it, a prominent lawyer and well-to-do member of Boston society. What to make of him?

I’ve been thinking of Perez Morton as a pompous ass (think: the insecure, egotistical cousin of the main character in Zadie Smith’s novel THE FRAUD). Morton became the grandmaster of the Masons. He was Attorney General for Massachusetts for many years. A prominent lawyer, in other words, one who had supported the revolution and garnered esteem from his peers. Still I didn’t like him, even if he didn’t coerce Fanny.

But then, just today, I found this hymn that Perez wrote (WHEN JESUS WEPT) and listened to a choral production of it and it kind of changed my mind about him.